Sigmoidoscopy screening probably works, but how well is still unknown.

نویسنده

  • Jack S Mandel
چکیده

The most persuasive scientific evidence for the benefit of a cancer screening test comes from a randomized controlled clinical trial (RCT) where the endpoint is a reduction in mortality from (or incidence of) the disease of interest. There have been three RCTs of a fecal occult blood test (Hemoccult; Beckman Coulter, Palo Alto, CA) for early detection of colorectal cancer involving more than 250 000 people that have shown consistent results (1–5). Unfortunately, for the other colorectal cancer screening methods (i.e., sigmoidoscopy, colonoscopy, virtual colonoscopy, barium enema, and other fecal occult blood tests), there is no adequately completed trial that provides a valid estimate of the effect of screening. RCTs are currently underway to evaluate sigmoidoscopy (6,7), and a pilot study has been implemented to examine the benefits associated with a one-time colonoscopy (8). Of the tests that have not undergone adequate

برای دانلود متن کامل این مقاله و بیش از 32 میلیون مقاله دیگر ابتدا ثبت نام کنید

ثبت نام

اگر عضو سایت هستید لطفا وارد حساب کاربری خود شوید

منابع مشابه

Re: improving the cost-effectiveness of colorectal cancer screening.

In an earlier issue of the Journal, we showed that sigmoidoscopy screening for colorectal cancer might result in net cost savings under expert-based assumptions (1). Although savings start to exceed costs after 22 years, it takes about 45 years for a continuing screening program to be compensated by savings before all costs. A screening program that terminates after 30 years will achieve net co...

متن کامل

Guidelines for colorectal cancer screening--a puzzle of tests and strategies.

Colorectal cancer (CRC) is a leading cause of cancer death around the World. An effective way to reduce colorectal cancer mortality is to screen for it and its precursor, the adenoma. In industrialized countries the mortality related to CRC is decreasing probably due to better screening programmes in average-risk individuals as well as changes in risk factors. Screening procedures are various i...

متن کامل

Population screening for colorectal cancer: advantages and drawbacks.

Screening for colorectal cancer (CRC) has been shown to reduce mortality from the disease as well as incidence. Several methods for screening are available, but none are ideal. The present short review discusses the advantages and drawbacks using fecal occult blood tests (FOBTs), fecal DNA tests, flexible sigmoidoscopy (FS), colonoscopy, double contrast barium enema, and computed tomographic co...

متن کامل

Patient satisfaction with screening flexible sigmoidoscopy.

BACKGROUND Screening flexible sigmoidoscopy is an underused cancer prevention procedure. Physicians often cite patient discomfort as a reason for not requesting sigmoidoscopy, but patient experiences and attitudes toward sigmoidoscopy have not been well studied. OBJECTIVE To measure patient satisfaction and the determinants of satisfaction with screening sigmoidoscopy. METHODS An instrument...

متن کامل

Expected long-term impact of screening endoscopy on colorectal cancer incidence: a modelling study

BACKGROUND & AIMS Screening endoscopy reduces colorectal cancer (CRC) incidence but the time course and magnitude of effects beyond 10 years after screening are unknown. We aimed to estimate the expected time course and magnitude of long-term impact of screening endoscopy on CRC incidence. METHODS We used Markov models based on the natural history of the disease along with data from the Germa...

متن کامل

ذخیره در منابع من


  با ذخیره ی این منبع در منابع من، دسترسی به آن را برای استفاده های بعدی آسان تر کنید

برای دانلود متن کامل این مقاله و بیش از 32 میلیون مقاله دیگر ابتدا ثبت نام کنید

ثبت نام

اگر عضو سایت هستید لطفا وارد حساب کاربری خود شوید

عنوان ژورنال:
  • Journal of the National Cancer Institute

دوره 95 8  شماره 

صفحات  -

تاریخ انتشار 2003